I wasn't always into Star Trek. I want to get that out now. It wasn't until I was a sophomore at NIU around the time of the shooting in February 2008 that I began watching Trek. I started with the original series that year. What I found with Star Trek was that the episodes were written well which was contrary to my belief that the show was just nerdy. I realized many of the episodes have less to do with weird Sci-Fi story lines and more with human relationships. Some of my favorite episodes have the crew of the Enterprise going through personal dilemmas that I could identify with. In many ways the show is very dated, but what do you expect from a show that's 47 years old? It was the following year of 2009 in which I watched Star Trek the Next Generation, Deep Space 9, and Voyager. I was in love with all these shows.
You grow to love the assorted crews of each ship or station and they become part of a pseudo family of yours if you will. One of the biggest things I realized when I finished these four shows was how there was something big missing from my life. What I realized was that I had grown accustomed to the ever present hum of the assorted ships engines that is ever present in each episode of Trek. Luckily for me I still had Star Trek Enterprise to watch.
I inadvertently became a big Star Trek fan. I wouldn't call myself a Trekkie, not by a long shot. I respect everything that Star Trek strode towards. At it's core it called for equality, tolerance, and hope. Star Trek the original series stood for many things like that, even Next Generation had episodes dealing with newer issues like "what constitutes life?" and others like when to help people and what war does to one's psyche. This is where I get really bothered by what the Hollywood studios and JJ Abrams call their brain dead flashy Star Trek movie.
JJ Abrams is great at making a science fiction movie with lasers and flashing lights and great special effects. That's about it. The franchise right now is being raped for its name only. Hollywood knows people will think: "Hey! Star Trek! I'm ironic and have never watched the show but clearly this is better!". I see a lot of that. I see so many people that tell me "Oh man you are really going to love this new into darkness movie huh?" When I say no people are flabbergasted. Star Trek isn't my life, when I finished all five major series and the six "good" movies I moved onto HBO shows like Six Feet Under, Oz, and The Wire. The main point about Trek is I simply grew to love the Star Trek shows. It's something I enjoy incredibly and I hate seeing the franchise that gave a lot to me get dumbed down so much. But people don't care. When Battlestar Galactica finished and Ronald D. Moore produced a prequel show about the origins of the 12 colonies and of Cylons nobody watched it. Not only that but people REFUSED to watch it. I have friends that refuse to watch it to this day, I just don't understand it! Caprica is a great show and and a great prequel to BSG. But then I started realizing something from all that, more in a minute.
Ronald D. Moore was a writer and producer for Star Trek the Next Generation and for Deep Space 9. Arguably the best episodes of the franchise. He also went onto Battlestar Galactica then Caprica before it got cancelled. Ron Moore presented episodes so well written I had never experienced anything like it since.
People like simple things. A quick high. They like big explosions and stories that take less than five seconds to understand. BSG is smarter than the Star Trek crap presented by JJ Abrams but what these have in common is explosions and sex and the like. The Star Trek shows and Caprica are both more about conflicts of relationships, political problems, and social inequalities. That's where people draw the line. If something isn't flashy but makes you think then it is lame. JJ Abrams' Star Trek is the opposite. Ron Moore was part of something that was so well written in Trek and BSG that any two part episode of either of the series he was involved with is better than any Abrams crap strewed onto the silver screen. I like to think and enjoy a story when I watch a movie or TV show.
Think of movies like Blade Runner. That movie is amazing, but why? Special effects are part of it but the story is what made Blade Runner such a good movie. There was a balance of good story and special effects. Now don't tell me that this new into darknes
s movie is going to be great or well written film. First off, there are definitely going to be many elements of Star Trek 2: Wrath of Khan in it, which makes it not original. Carol Marcus is one of the characters in the movie who was a main character in Khan who was in charge of the Genesis Project. Spock is probably going to die in this movie then be brought back to life. Wait. That happened before! But what is different? By the time Wrath of Khan came out there had been years of the Kirk-Spock relationship growing in front of the audience. When Spock died it was emotional. I will guarantee you that if and when Spock dies in into darkness there will be no emotion. We just met these characters and as of the last 5 minutes of the first movie Kirk and Spock were still fist-fighting each other. Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.
s movie is going to be great or well written film. First off, there are definitely going to be many elements of Star Trek 2: Wrath of Khan in it, which makes it not original. Carol Marcus is one of the characters in the movie who was a main character in Khan who was in charge of the Genesis Project. Spock is probably going to die in this movie then be brought back to life. Wait. That happened before! But what is different? By the time Wrath of Khan came out there had been years of the Kirk-Spock relationship growing in front of the audience. When Spock died it was emotional. I will guarantee you that if and when Spock dies in into darkness there will be no emotion. We just met these characters and as of the last 5 minutes of the first movie Kirk and Spock were still fist-fighting each other. Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.
I'm one of the very few who care about this. No, I will not be seeing into darkness. I'm not going to waste my time with that Hollywood garbage. What doesn't help in my opinion of JJ Abrams is how he is going to now also direct the new Star Wars movies. If you really want me mad just tell me how JJ is going to make good on the Star Wars franchise. Man oh man I'm fuming right now thinking of that garbage. Young Han Solo most likely played by the guy who plays Kirk? You have got to be insane. But that's for another blog. Hollywood and people in general really don't care what gets thrown up at the movies anymore. It's all for money and that's it. People don't read, people don't think, I don't know what else to say. I'll take solace in one fact however: In my mind these shows and movies that I grew up watching will always be the same no matter how much garbage that gets brought in tries to ruin those shows and movies for me.